![]() ![]() The body was also rather heavy, which combined with the small motor made the car underpowered and slow, reaching a top speed of 63 mph (101 km/h). Its body was largely inspired by the Rolls-Royce and Bentley luxury limousines of the era, most notably the Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn, but was much smaller, thus making the design and proportions look rather odd. It shared some components with the Standard Vanguard and had a motor that was based on that of the Standard Ten. The Triumph Mayflower was an attempt by Triumph to manufacture a luxury small car that, as its name suggests, was to appeal mainly to the US market. 8.3 Mitsubishi Mirage (sixth generation) (2012–present).7.13 General Motors U-body minivans (third generation) (2005–09).6.2 General Motors U Platform minivan (1990–96).6.1 Ford Escort MK V (European version) (1990–92).5.14 General Motors E-Body luxury cars (1986–93).5.8 Chevrolet Camaro equipped with the Iron Duke engine (1982–85).5.6 Renault Fuego (North American version) (1982–84).5.2 General Motors X platform compact cars (1980–85). ![]() 5.1 Chevrolet Corvette 305 "California" (1980).4.16 General Motors cars with Oldsmobile diesel engines (1978–1985).2.2 Renault Dauphine (North American version) (1956–67).Conversely, some vehicles which were poorly received at the time ended up being reevaluated by collectors and became cult classics. Some of these cars were popular on the marketplace or were critically praised at their launch, but have earned a negative retroactive reception, while others are not considered to be intrinsically "bad", but have acquired infamy for safety or emissions defects that damaged the car's reputation. Different sources use a variety of criteria for including negative reception that includes the worst cars for the environment, meeting criteria that includes the worst crash test scores, the lowest projected reliability, and the lowest projected residual values, earning a "not acceptable" rating after thorough testing, determining if a car has performed to expectations using owner satisfaction surveys whether they "would definitely buy the same car again if given the choice," as well as " lemon lists" of unreliable cars with bad service support, and the opinionated writing with humorous tongue-in-cheek descriptions by "self pro-claimed voice of reason." įor inclusion, these automobiles have either been referred to in popular publications as the worst of all time, or have received negative reviews across multiple publications. Cars on this list may have been judged by poor critical reception, poor customer reception, safety defects, and/or poor workmanship. There are no objective quantifiable standards. This is a list of automobiles known for negative reception.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |